Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Mar;16(3):573-82.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.3.573.

Biomonitoring of workers exposed to 4,4'-methylenedianiline or 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate

Affiliations

Biomonitoring of workers exposed to 4,4'-methylenedianiline or 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate

D Schütze et al. Carcinogenesis. 1995 Mar.

Abstract

4,4'-Methylenedianiline (MDA) and 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) are important intermediates in the production of polyurethanes. In order to biomonitor people exposed to low levels of MDA or MDI we have developed sensitive methods to measure hemoglobin (Hb) adducts and urine metabolites. Adducts and metabolites from 33 workers exposed to MDA and 27 workers exposed to MDI were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after hydrolysis, extraction and derivatization with heptafluorobutyric anhydride. Hb adducts of MDA were detected in 31 out of the 33 MDA workers and both MDA and N-acetyl-MDA (AcMDA) were found in 20 of these individuals. The detection limit for MDA was 20 fmol and for AcMDA 100 fmol/sample, which correspond to an absolute detection limit of approximately 1 fmol MDA and 5 fmol AcMDA, respectively. In the urine of workers exposed to MDA both MDA and AcMDA were found in all samples, with the exception of five where only MDA was detected. Acid hydrolysis of the urine samples yielded an approximately 3-fold higher concentration of MDA than the sum of MDA and AcMDA found after base hydrolysis. MDA but not AcMDA found in urine and in Hb correlate well, except for three outliers. In one workers the Hb adduct level of MDA was very low compared to the urine levels. Two workers had very high levels of MDA as Hb adducts but very low levels as urine metabolites. The former case indicates that the workers were recently exposed to higher levels of MDA. The latter case suggests a relatively low recent exposure. The air levels of MDA, monitored using personal air monitors, were below the detection limit. It was possible, however, to determine exposure to MDA for all workers with the methods presented in this publication. Workers exposed exclusively to MDI were studied. Exposure levels, as monitored using personal air samplers, were below the detection limit of 3 micrograms/m3, with the exception of three individuals. In 10 of the MDI workers, hydrolyzable Hb adducts of MDA (57-219 fmol/g Hb) were found. Except for four subjects, the presence of MDA (0.007-0.14 nmol/l) and AcMDA (0.08-3 nmol/l) was detected in all urine samples after base treatment. Following acid hydrolysis of the urine, higher levels of MDA (0.7-10 nmol/l) were found than the sum of free MDA and AcMDA. According to the present data, it was possible to detect exposure to MDI in a greater number of individuals by analyzing urinary metabolites than by measuring Hb adducts or air monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources