Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Mar;36(3):462-7.
doi: 10.1136/gut.36.3.462.

Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods

Affiliations

Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods

M A Quine et al. Gut. 1995 Mar.

Abstract

A prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 36 hospitals across two regions provided data from 14,149 gastroscopies of which 1113 procedures were therapeutic and 13,036 were diagnostic. Most patients received gastroscopy under intravenous sedation; midazolam was the preferred agent in the North West and diazepam was preferred in East Anglia. Mean doses of each agent used were 5.7 mg and 13.8 mg respectively, although there was a wide distribution of doses reported. Only half of the patients endoscoped had some form of intravenous access in situ and few were supplied with supplementary oxygen. The death rate from this study for diagnostic endoscopy was 1 in 2000 and the morbidity rate was 1 in 200; cardiorespiratory complications were the most prominent in this group and there was a strong relation between the lack of monitoring and use of high dose benzodiazepines and the occurrence of adverse outcomes. In particular there was a link between the use of local anaesthetic sprays and the development of pneumonia after gastroscopy (p < 0.001). Twenty perforations occurred out of a total of 774 dilatations of which eight patients died (death rate 1 in 100). A number of units were found to have staffing problems, to be lacking in basic facilities, and to have poor or virtually non-existent recovery areas. In addition, a number of junior endoscopists were performing endoscopy unsupervised and with minimal training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Endoscopy. 1990 Sep;22(5):229-33 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Jan-Feb;39(1):33-6 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jul-Aug;37(4):421-7 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 1991 Jul;23(4):199-202 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1976 Oct;17(10):797-800 - PubMed

Substances