Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Jan;33(1):229-32.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.229-232.1995.

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility methods for detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility methods for detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

D L Kiska et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan.

Abstract

We sought to determine if commercially available susceptibility tests were accurate in detecting penicillin resistance and relative resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. We compared the reference MIC method with oxacillin disk screening and three commercial tests, E-test (AB Biodisk), JustOne (Radiometer America), and MicroScan Pos MIC Panel Type 6 (Baxter Diagnostics), with 80 selected clinical isolates. Thirty-three additional isolates were tested by the reference method and the E-test to further validate the latter method. Oxacillin screening was effective in detecting all penicillin-resistant and relatively resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. The MicroScan method was not effective in detecting penicillin resistance or relative resistance. The JustOne system classified only 6 (35%) of 17 resistant strains correctly, with 11 resistant strains classified as relatively resistant. The E-test correctly classified 30 (83%) of 36 resistant isolates, with 6 resistant isolates interpreted as relatively resistant. For determining penicillin MICs for S. pneumoniae, the E-test was the most accurate of the commercial systems that we studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1981 Oct 10;2(8250):771-3 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Feb;18(2):188-93 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):749-52 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 2;317(1):18-22 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;157(2):256-63 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources