Similar articles

• A retrospective comparison of three different methods for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells.

  Mangan KF, Mullaney MT, Klumpp TR, Goldberg SL, Macdonald JS. Mangan KF, et al. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994;389:441-8. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994. PMID: 7535452 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
• Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: comparing cyclophosphamide and growth factor based regimens.

  Janssen WE, Smilee R, Carter R, Rahn D, Cairo M, Hiemenz JH, Zorsky PE, Fields KK, Ballester O, Perkins J, et al. Janssen WE, et al. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994;389:429-39. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994. PMID: 7700915 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
• Comparison of three mobilization regimens for peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue after high dose chemotherapy.

  Lee WJ, Zimmerman T, Meyers S, Bender JG, Williams SF. Lee WJ, et al. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994;389:421-7. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994. PMID: 7535451 No abstract available.
• Methods of stem cell mobilization.

  Dasgupta A, Willerford DM, McAfee SL. Dasgupta A, et al. J Infus Chemother. 1996 Winter;6(1):12-6. J Infus Chemother. 1996. PMID: 8748001 Review.
• Clinical implications of the heterogeneity of hematopoietic progenitors elicited in peripheral blood by anticancer therapy with cyclophosphamide and cytokine(s).

  Siena S, Bregni M, Bonsi L, Strippoli P, Peccatori F, Magni M, Di Nicola M, Bagnara GP, Massimo Gianni A. Siena S, et al. Stem Cells. 1993 Jul;11 Suppl 2:72-5. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530110812. Stem Cells. 1993. PMID: 8104618 Review.