Current strategies for dentist-applied treatment in the management of hypersensitive dentine
- PMID: 7702457
- DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90195-3
Current strategies for dentist-applied treatment in the management of hypersensitive dentine
Abstract
Few of the many dentist-applied treatments for dentine hypersensitivity meet the requirements of an ideal desensitizing agent'. This paper, although not exhaustive, covers methods that may be classified from simplest to most complex. Topical methods are simple, but they are often uncomfortable and the effects usually quite short-lasting, and many fall short of the 'ideal'. Fluorides and oxalates appear to be the best topical methods. Iontophoresis of fluoride represents an intermediate stage of complexity and it meets most of the criteria of an ideal desensitizing agent. Newer restorative materials, such as glass-ionomer cements and dentine bonding agents, are the most complex. These are still under investigation, but when the tooth needs recontouring, or in difficult cases that do not respond to other treatments, the dentist may choose to use a restorative material. Resin primers alone could be promising but the effects are not permanent and investigation into their use is still under way. Finally, laser treatment has been espoused for dentine desensitization. This requires extremely expensive equipment, must be dentist applied, and might produce pulpal irritation. Much more study is needed on restorative treatments and lasers before they can be considered as effective desensitizing agents. Until that research is completed, the dentist must choose one or more of the available methods in order to have a clinical therapy that is likely to relieve the symptoms of hypersensitive dentine.
Similar articles
-
Managing dentin hypersensitivity: what treatment to recommend to patients.J Am Dent Assoc. 1992 Apr;123(4):57-61. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0107. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992. PMID: 1597627
-
Dentists' perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity and knowledge of its treatment.J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Mar;29(3):219-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00812.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2002. PMID: 11896837
-
Update on dentin desensitization.Dent Today. 2000 Mar;19(3):52-6. Dent Today. 2000. PMID: 12522858 No abstract available.
-
Dentine hypersensitivity: a review.Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 Aug;7(4):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00200.x. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991. PMID: 1915127 Review.
-
Managing dentin hypersensitivity.J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16803826 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative clinical evaluation of gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser and potassium nitrate in treating dentinal hypersensitivity.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):391-397. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_310_16. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017. PMID: 29491586 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of CO2 laser with or without nanohydroxyapatite paste in the occlusion of dentinal tubules.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:798732. doi: 10.1155/2014/798732. Epub 2014 Oct 20. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 25386616 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Iontophoresis with 0.33% Sodium Fluoride Gel and Diode Laser Alone on Occlusion of Dentinal Tubules.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC123-ZC126. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29428.10526. Epub 2017 Aug 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28969290 Free PMC article.
-
Iontophoretic Drug Delivery in the Oral Cavity.Pharmaceutics. 2018 Aug 7;10(3):121. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030121. Pharmaceutics. 2018. PMID: 30087247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Investigation of Bioelectric Toothbrush for Dentin Hypersensitivity Management: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;11(9):923. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090923. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39329665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources