Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1995;82(1):20-7.

[Routine use of electronic portal imaging. Positioning verification in 922 successive pelvic fields]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7702935
Review

[Routine use of electronic portal imaging. Positioning verification in 922 successive pelvic fields]

[Article in French]
R Trouette et al. Bull Cancer Radiother. 1995.

Abstract

Treatment reproducibility is a major criterion of quality assurance in radiation therapy. During each course, the same dose should be delivered in the same volume of irradiation. Today, portal imaging devices can be used routinely to check and correct patient positioning before much of the daily irradiation has been delivered. In this study we used the Portal Vision Varian (PVV) system during pelvic irradiation in 16 patients. This device can automatically acquire portal images in the first seconds of each course. Observed discrepancies are directly classified by the radiation oncologist according to their type (cranio-caudal, lateral, antero-posterior) and severity (correction of patient positioning is necessary or not). In case of error, patient positioning is corrected before the end of irradiation. Of the 922 portals analysed with PVV, 901 could be analysed (97%). Two hundred and ninety-nine positioning discrepancies were observed (33%) with 59 of them leading to correction (6%). Most of the time, these errors concerned antero-posterior portals. Finally, each patient had an average of 18 to 19 discrepancies which were mainly of no importance for treatment quality. Nevertheless, real errors leading to correction were observed in 14 patients (88%) with an average of four per patient. In some patients many errors occurred, while in others only a few. These shifts were not related to patient weight and thickness but probably a portal dimension. In summary, we think that during pelvic irradiation a portal imaging device should be used daily to improve treatment quality. This system can help the radiation oncologist to discover many positioning errors (an average of four) in the majority of patients (88%) and to correct them before the end of irradiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources