Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Apr;107(4):394-400.
doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70092-7.

An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite

Affiliations
Comparative Study

An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite

B L O'Byrn et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Apr.

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted to determine whether mandibular symmetry in adults with untreated unilateral posterior crossbite was different from that found in adults with untreated Class I malocclusions. Thirty adults, 18 years or older, with a unilateral posterior crossbite were compared with 30 adults exhibiting Angle Class I malocclusions. Skeletal and dental symmetry were assessed with submentovertex (SMV) radiographs, whereas condylar position within the glenoid fossa was analyzed with horizontally corrected tomograms. Relative to a mandibular coordinate system, the mandibular first molar on the crossbite side was found to be more lateral and relatively distal in comparison to the contralateral side. Skeletally, the mandible showed no asymmetry. Relative to the cranial floor, the mandible was "rotated" so that the condyle on the crossbite side was positioned relatively posteriorly in comparison to the contralateral side. A relative posterior positioning of the glenoid fossa was inferred, since there was no demonstrable mandibular skeletal asymmetry or condylar displacement within the fossa as shown on corrected tomograms in the crossbite group as compared with the Class I group. The results question whether it is appropriate to correct unilateral posterior crossbites in adults by orthodontic tooth movement alone, given the skeletal remodeling in the temporomandibular joint, which may have already occurred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources