Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Apr;71(4):894-7.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.172.

Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit

H Mitchell et al. Br J Cancer. 1995 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The relationship between negative cervical cytology reports and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix was evaluated in a case-control study of 113 cases and 452 controls. All cases and controls had received at least two negative cytology reports. There was no significant difference between the cases and controls in the number of negative cytology reports or in history of cervical abnormality; while a test for trend in the time since last negative cytology report was significant (P < 0.001), the estimated benefit was very modest. Although the estimates of relative protection were higher in women aged less than 35 years than in women aged 35-69 years, this difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that cervical screening as practised in the 1970s and 1980s was much less effective in preventing adenocarcinoma than squamous carcinoma of the cervix.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Oct 1;129(3):304-15 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976 Apr;83(4):320-5 - PubMed
    1. Pathol Res Pract. 1984 Sep;179(1):38-50 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 25;290(6481):1543-6 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986 Mar;76(3):423-8 - PubMed