Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Feb;7(2):109-16.

Antroduodenal manometry: 24-hour ambulatory monitoring versus short-term stationary manometry in patients with functional dyspepsia

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7712300
Comparative Study

Antroduodenal manometry: 24-hour ambulatory monitoring versus short-term stationary manometry in patients with functional dyspepsia

R J Jebbink et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the interdigestive and postprandial antroduodenal motility patterns of patients with functional dyspepsia using prolonged ambulatory antroduodenal manometry and to compare these findings with conventional stationary manometry.

Methods: Prolonged ambulatory and short-term stationary antroduodenal manometry were performed in 10 patients with functional dyspepsia and in 10 healthy volunteers (controls).

Results: During stationary manometry only a few interdigestive motor complex (MMC) cycles were recorded. Using the ambulatory technique, fewer MMC cycles were observed in patients than in controls (2.2 +/- 0.63 and 4.1 +/- 0.54, respectively; P = 0.030). During phase II of the MMC, both techniques showed a higher antral motility index in patients (P = 0.017 and P = 0.049 for stationary and ambulatory manometry, respectively). The postprandial antral motility index was similar for patients and controls using stationary manometry. With the ambulatory technique, the antral motility index 1-1.5 h after breakfast was lower in patients than in controls (P = 0.020). Both techniques showed that the patients had a higher duodenal motility index after dinner and after breakfast (P < 0.05). Both techniques revealed more burst activity in patients than in controls (stationary: 10.7 versus 1.8% of the time; ambulatory: 1.7 versus 0.2% of the time; P = 0.004 and P = 0.051, respectively). Using a 10-min window period before the onset of symptoms, seven symptom episodes (33.3%) were found to be related to burst activity and retrograde or non-propagated phase III activity.

Conclusions: Ambulatory manometry is superior to stationary manometry for evaluating patients with functional dyspepsia, because patients can be studied for a prolonged period (allowing adequate evaluation of interdigestive abnormalities) and under physiological conditions. Prolonged monitoring also allows assessment of the relationship between symptoms and motor abnormalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources