Analysis of centromeric activity in Robertsonian translocations: implications for a functional acrocentric hierarchy
- PMID: 7720412
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00337384
Analysis of centromeric activity in Robertsonian translocations: implications for a functional acrocentric hierarchy
Abstract
Approximately 90% of human Robertsonian translocations occur between nonhomologous acrocentric chromosomes, producing dicentric elements which are stable in meiosis and mitosis, implying that one centromere is functionally inactivated or suppressed. To determine if this suppression is random, centromeric activity in 48 human dicentric Robertsonian translocations was assigned by assessment of the primary constrictions using dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Preferential activity/constriction of one centromere was observed in all except three different rearrangements. The activity is meiotically stable since intrafamilial consistency of a preferentially active centromere existed in members of six families. These results support evidence for nonrandom centromeric activity in humans and, more importantly, suggest a functional hierarchy in Robertsonian translocations with the chromosome 14 centromere most often active and the chromosome 15 centromere least often active.
Similar articles
-
Evidence for structural heterogeneity from molecular cytogenetic analysis of dicentric Robertsonian translocations.Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):167-75. Am J Hum Genet. 1996. PMID: 8659523 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of centromeric antigens in dicentric Robertsonian translocations: CENP-C and CENP-E are necessary components of functional centromeres.Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Dec;4(12):2189-97. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.12.2189. Hum Mol Genet. 1995. PMID: 8634687
-
Chromosome stability is maintained by short intercentromeric distance in functionally dicentric human Robertsonian translocations.Chromosome Res. 1998 Feb;6(2):115-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1009286929145. Chromosome Res. 1998. PMID: 9543014
-
Moving satellites and unstable chromosome translocations: clinical and cytogenetic implications.Am J Med Genet. 1993 Jul 1;46(6):715-20. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460624. Am J Med Genet. 1993. PMID: 8362916 Review.
-
Stable non-Robertsonian dicentric chromosomes: four new cases and a review.J Med Genet. 2001 Jan;38(1):76-9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.1.76. J Med Genet. 2001. PMID: 11335984 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population.Chromosome Res. 2002;10(8):707-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1021589031769. Chromosome Res. 2002. PMID: 12575798
-
Evidence for structural heterogeneity from molecular cytogenetic analysis of dicentric Robertsonian translocations.Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):167-75. Am J Hum Genet. 1996. PMID: 8659523 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic variation within alpha satellite DNA influences centromere location on human chromosomes with metastable epialleles.Genome Res. 2016 Oct;26(10):1301-1311. doi: 10.1101/gr.206706.116. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Genome Res. 2016. PMID: 27510565 Free PMC article.
-
Telomere disruption results in non-random formation of de novo dicentric chromosomes involving acrocentric human chromosomes.PLoS Genet. 2010 Aug 12;6(8):e1001061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001061. PLoS Genet. 2010. PMID: 20711355 Free PMC article.
-
α satellite DNA variation and function of the human centromere.Nucleus. 2017 Jul 4;8(4):331-339. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1308989. Epub 2017 Apr 13. Nucleus. 2017. PMID: 28406740 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources