Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch?
- PMID: 7720443
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02054224
Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch?
Abstract
Purpose: Different studies have shown that low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis often yield poor functional results. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a colonic reservoir is able to improve functional results.
Methods: Thirty-eight consecutive patients subjected to low anterior resection were randomized following rectal excision in two groups. One (n = 19) had a stapled straight coloanal anastomosis, and the other (n = 19) had a 10-cm stapled colonic pouch low rectal anastomosis. Median anastomotic distance above the anal verge was 3.38 +/- 0.56 cm and 2.14 +/- 0.36 cm in both groups, respectively. Continence alterations, urgency, tenesmus, defecatory frequency, anal resting and maximum voluntary squeezing pressures, and maximum tolerable volume were evaluated one year later.
Results: One patient died of pulmonary embolism, and seven presented with a recurrence and were excluded from the study. Stool frequency was greater than three movements per day in 33.3 percent of cases with a reservoir and in 73.3 percent of those with a straight coloanal anastomosis (P < 0.05). Maximum tolerable volume was significantly greater in patients with a reservoir (335 +/- 195) than in those without (148 +/- 38) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other variables studied.
Conclusions: This study shows that some aspects of defecatory function after rectal excision could improve with a colonic reservoir.
Similar articles
-
Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):660-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6264-3. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002. PMID: 12004217 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained?Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jun;41(6):740-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02236262. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998. PMID: 9645742
-
Functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis with J-colonic pouch for rectal cancer.Ann Ital Chir. 1998 Jul-Aug;69(4):485-9. Ann Ital Chir. 1998. PMID: 9835124
-
[Colon pouch as neorectum. Technique, indications and results].Zentralbl Chir. 2001;126 Suppl 1:55-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19201. Zentralbl Chir. 2001. PMID: 11819174 Review. German.
-
Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 21;12(39):6252-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6252. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 17072945 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A meta-analysis comparing side to end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2010 Jun;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0576-1. Epub 2010 Apr 27. Tech Coloproctol. 2010. PMID: 20422436
-
Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties?Surg Today. 1999;29(12):1237-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02482214. Surg Today. 1999. PMID: 10639703 Clinical Trial.
-
Abdominopreanal proctocolectomy and ileal U-pouch in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.Surg Today. 1996;26(11):861-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00311786. Surg Today. 1996. PMID: 8931215 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study.BMC Surg. 2016 Apr 18;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0133-6. BMC Surg. 2016. PMID: 27090553 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD006040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006040.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18425933 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources