Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain--options of 1091 Finnish parturients
- PMID: 7725885
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb05593.x
Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain--options of 1091 Finnish parturients
Abstract
A prospective survey of 1091 Finnish parturients was conducted in order to ascertain mothers' expectations for labour pain relief, to measure the actual pain during all three stages of labour and to question their satisfaction and the adequacy of pain relief on the third day following delivery. Antenatal expectations for pain relief were surveyed. Mothers were questioned on pain levels in the delivery room and 3 days after giving birth. Pain levels were ascertained using a visual pain score method. Antenatally, 90% of all parturients anticipated a need for pain relief during labour. In the delivery room over 80% of all parturients described their pain as very severe to intolerable, only 4% of the multiparous had low pain scores (0-2). After pain treatment 50% of multiparous women still had pain scores from 8 to 10, which reflects a lack of effective pain relief. Dissatisfaction with the childbirth experience was very low, and was associated with instrumental deliveries, but not with the usage of analgesia. 51% of all parturients complained of inadequate pain relief during childbirth, which, in multiparous women, was significantly associated with the second stage of labour.
Similar articles
-
Primiparous and multiparous women's birthing experiences and satisfaction with pain management in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery-A prospective cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1143-1152. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15083. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40296434 Free PMC article.
-
The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1,000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour.Anaesth Intensive Care. 1991 Aug;19(3):393-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900316. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1991. PMID: 1767909
-
Single-shot spinal block for labour analgesia in multiparous parturients*.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Aug;49(7):1023-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00803.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005. PMID: 16045666
-
Ambulatory labor analgesia: what does an obstetrician need to know?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 May;83(5):415-24. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00344.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004. PMID: 15059151 Review.
-
Modern neuraxial labour analgesia.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jun;28(3):285-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000183. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015. PMID: 25827278 Review.
Cited by
-
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for the management of pain in labour and childbirth [ISRCTN52287533].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004 Dec 9;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-24. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004. PMID: 15588303 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07602-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40287641 Free PMC article.
-
Continuing epidural analgesia during the second stage and ACOG definition of arrest of labor on maternal-fetal outcomes.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Sep;64(8):1187-1193. doi: 10.1111/aas.13611. Epub 2020 May 14. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020. PMID: 32320051 Free PMC article.
-
Labour pain relief practice by maternal health care providers at a tertiary facility in Kenya: An institution-based descriptive survey.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299211. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38452017 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022. PMID: 36339636 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical