Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer
- PMID: 7726256
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91479-x
Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer
Abstract
Objective: Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of ascertaining aneuploidy for chromosomes X, Y, 18, and 16 by use of multiple-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization in blastomeres from preimplantation human embryos.
Study design: A short fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure involving the simultaneous use of four deoxyribonucleic acid probes detected with red, green, blue, or a mixture of red and green fluorochromes was developed to determine numeric abnormalities of chromosomes X, Y, 18, and 16. Embryos underwent biopsy, and all or most cells were analyzed to distinguish true aneuploidy from mosaicism and to assess technique variations within the same embryo (n = 64).
Results: The analysis of all the blastomeres of an embryo was achieved in 91% of the embryos. Successful analyses including biopsy, fixation, and fluorescence in situ hybridization were achieved in 87.8% of the blastomeres. Of the four chromosomes tested, numeric aberrations were found in 23% and 42% of normally and abnormally developing embryos, respectively, including aneuploidy, polyploidy, haploidy, and mosaicism. When diploid embryos containing one or several tetraploid cells are counted as chromosomally abnormal, then 49% and 61% of normally and abnormally developing embryos, respectively, were chromosomally abnormal. Aneuploid embryos consisted of two monosomies for chromosome 16, one for chromosome 18, and a trisomy for chromosome 16. There was a tendency for aneuploidy to increase with maternal age.
Conclusions: Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a more efficient method than cytogenetic analysis to study specific aneuploidies at preimplantation stages of development in human embryos. In addition, the preimplantation genetic diagnosis of two blastomeres per eight-cell embryo may be sufficient to ensure successful analysis of polyploidy, haploidy, and specific aneuploidies without endangering the survival of the embryo. The technique can be easily modified to consider other chromosomes, including 13 and 21. Because most chromosomally abnormal embryos do not develop to term, the use of this technique may increase the delivery rate per embryo by allowing only transfer of embryos normal for the tested chromosomes. This technique would be most useful for older women undergoing in vitro fertilization, because aneuploidy appears to increase with advancing maternal age.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos.Hum Reprod. 1993 Dec;8(12):2185-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138001. Hum Reprod. 1993. PMID: 8150922
-
Aneuploidy 16 in human embryos increases significantly with maternal age.Fertil Steril. 1996 Aug;66(2):248-55. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8690111
-
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos.Fertil Steril. 1997 Dec;68(6):1128-31. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00412-3. Fertil Steril. 1997. PMID: 9418710 Clinical Trial.
-
Multicolor detection of every chromosome as a means of detecting mosaicism and nuclear organization in human embryonic nuclei.Panminerva Med. 2016 Jun;58(2):175-90. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Panminerva Med. 2016. PMID: 26982524 Review.
-
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review.Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jun;22(6):512-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.388. Prenat Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12116318 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in high-risk patients: a retrospective cohort study.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2024 Mar;51(1):75-84. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2023.06394. Epub 2023 Dec 27. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2024. PMID: 38148475 Free PMC article.
-
Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection safe? Current status and future concerns.Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Dec;2(6):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s11934-001-0034-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2001. PMID: 12084226 Review.
-
In vitro fertilization does not increase the incidence of de novo copy number alterations in fetal and placental lineages.Nat Med. 2019 Nov;25(11):1699-1705. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0620-2. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Nat Med. 2019. PMID: 31686035
-
Somatic genomic variations in early human prenatal development.Curr Genomics. 2010 Sep;11(6):397-401. doi: 10.2174/138920210793175967. Curr Genomics. 2010. PMID: 21358983 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.Genes (Basel). 2020 May 29;11(6):602. doi: 10.3390/genes11060602. Genes (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32485954 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources