Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 May;85(5):650-5.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.650.

The costs and effects of a nutritional education program following work-site cholesterol screening

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The costs and effects of a nutritional education program following work-site cholesterol screening

T Byers et al. Am J Public Health. 1995 May.

Erratum in

  • Am J Public Health 1996 Jun;86(6):790

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the costs and impact of a nutrition education program following a cholesterol screening.

Methods: Forty work-sites were randomly assigned to one of two educational interventions: a "usual" intervention of 5 minutes of counseling, or a "special" intervention of 2 hours of behaviorally based education on dietary changes to lower serum cholesterol. Costs were monitored, and cholesterol levels were retested 6 and 12 months later.

Results: The total per-person cost for screening and the educational intervention was about $50. Cholesterol levels differed little between the two intervention groups 6 months after screening, but after 12 months those in the special intervention worksites showed a 6.5% drop in cholesterol, whereas those at the usual intervention worksites showed a drop of only 3.0%. Hence a 3.5% cholesterol reduction was attributable to the special intervention.

Conclusions: A behaviorally based nutrition education program following cholesterol screening can have a meaningful impact on long-term cholesterol levels at a low cost. Nutrition education in work-sites may therefore be a useful way to lower the risk of heart disease in communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med J. 1980 Mar 15;280(6216):747-51 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1983 Jul;12(4):523-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jun;76(6):647-56 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1986 May;15(3):282-91 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Med. 1988 Feb;30(2):106-12 - PubMed

Publication types