Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Jan;15(1):129-34.

Prospective randomised double-blind trial of the in vivo use of recombinant human erythropoietin in bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors. The Australian Bone Marrow Transplant Study Group

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7742745
Clinical Trial

Prospective randomised double-blind trial of the in vivo use of recombinant human erythropoietin in bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors. The Australian Bone Marrow Transplant Study Group

J C Biggs et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jan.

Abstract

Ninety one patients between the ages of 17 and 58 years undergoing histocompatible allogeneic transplants from sibling donors were entered into a double-blind randomised trial to evaluate the effect of human erythropoietin (rhu EPO) at a dose of 300 units per kg/day given thrice weekly by intravenous injection on erythropoiesis and on erythrocyte and platelet transfusion requirements. Dose was ceased when the haemoglobin exceeded 12g/dL and recommenced if the haemoglobin fell below 12 g/dL, at 150 units/kg/day. If the haemoglobin exceeded 12 g/dL on a further occasion, the dose of rhu EPO was not given. Patients received two units of erythrocytes when the haemoglobin dropped below 8.5g/dL and received platelet transfusions when the count dropped below 20 x 10(9)/L. Univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher reticulocyte count, haemoglobin concentration and bone marrow erythropoiesis after day 14 in the group receiving rhu EPO but this was not reflected in decreased erythrocyte transfusion (7 +/- 5 in controls versus 6 +/- 5 in rhu EPO group) or in platelet transfusions (11 +/- 7 in controls versus 11 +/- 9 in rhu EPO group). Hospitalisation in each group was the same (29 +/- 8 in the control group and 28 +/- 8 in the rhu EPO group). However, in the multivariate analysis, the administration of rhu EPO was associated with an 18% reduction in erythrocyte transfusion requirement when other variables were taken into account. No side-effects due to rhu EPO were detected in this study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources