Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Dec;6(6):459-63.
doi: 10.1007/BF03324278.

Analgesic effect of intranasal and intramuscular salmon calcitonin in post-menopausal osteoporosis: a double-blind, double-placebo study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Analgesic effect of intranasal and intramuscular salmon calcitonin in post-menopausal osteoporosis: a double-blind, double-placebo study

A E Pontiroli et al. Aging (Milano). 1994 Dec.

Abstract

Different types of calcitonin (porcine, human, salmon) are used in the management of bone diseases characterized by a high bone turnover, such as post-menopausal osteoporosis and Paget's disease; recently, salmon calcitonin has become clinically available as an intranasal (i.n.) spray. An analgesic effect has also been described for calcitonins, both in experimental animals and humans, but only a few studies in humans were placebo controlled. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of i.n. and intramuscular (i.m.) salmon calcitonin (sCT) and of placebo in women affected by painful post-menopausal osteoporosis, in a double-blind, double-placebo trial. Twenty-eight women were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: 1) i.n. sCT 200 U/day plus i.m. placebo; 2) i.n. placebo plus i.m. sCT 100 U/day; and 3) i.n. and i.m. placebo. Each treatment lasted four weeks, and the pain score was evaluated weekly by means of a visual analogic scale (VAS). Twenty-four women completed the trial; with i.n. sCT, the pain score decreased significantly by the second week of treatment (p < 0.05); with i.m. sCT and with placebo, the pain score decreased significantly only by the fourth week (p < 0.05), so that the final pain scores obtained with the three treatments were not different. We conclude that i.n. sCT was probably more rapid, but not more effective than i.m. sCT or placebo in decreasing pain in post-menopausal osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources