Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1995 Jun;153(6):1817-9.

The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7752325
Case Reports

The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma

M Monga et al. J Urol. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

Ureteral stents are an integral part of urological practice. However, stents that migrate, fragment or are forgotten pose a management and legal dilemma. Our series consists of 31 patients, 22 with forgotten stents that were left indwelling for more than 6 months (mean 22.7) and 9 migrated stents. Of the forgotten stents 15 (68%) were calcified, 10 (45%) were fragmented, and 3 (14%) were calcified and fragmented. Procedures to render the patient stent-free were ureteroscopy in 16 (52%), percutaneous nephroscopy in 8 (26%), cystoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 6 (19%), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 10 (32%), open cysto-litholapaxy in 1 (3%) and simple nephrectomy in 1 (3%). Multiple procedures were required in 6 patients (19%). Management of such complicated ureteral stents requires a multimodal therapeutic approach incorporating the latest in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourological techniques. These patients are at increased risk for loss of renal function. A computerized tracking registry of ureteral stents may help prevent this urological travesty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types