Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jun;195(3):769-76.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754009.

MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation

Affiliations

MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation

N G Campeau et al. Radiology. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively compare use of a phased-array multicoil and a conventional body coil in abdominal MR imaging.

Materials and methods: Thirteen patients (seven men, six women; mean age, 55 years) underwent imaging with a phased-array multicoil and with a conventional body coil. Four pulse sequences were used: T2-weighted spin echo (SE), magnetization-prepared gradient-recalled echo (GRE), breath-hold fast SE, and echo planar (EP).

Results: Lesion detection improved the most on fast SE, multicoil-acquired images. Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) increased 64% with fast SE (P = .0005) and EP (P < .0109) sequences. Contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) doubled (P < .05) with T2-weighted SE sequences. Lesion conspicuity improved on multicoil-acquired images with all fast sequences (magnetization-prepared GRE, P = .015; fast SE, P = .002; EP imaging, P = .013). There was little difference in respiratory and vascular artifact. Depiction of most abdominal structures improved (P < .01).

Conclusion: Use of the phased-array multicoil provides better MR images of the abdomen than does use of a conventional body coil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources