Comparing non-nested regression models
- PMID: 7766768
Comparing non-nested regression models
Abstract
A method for comparing the fits of two non-nested models, based on a suggestion of Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), is developed in the context of linear and nonlinear regression with normal errors. Each model is regarded as a special case of an artificial "supermodel" and is obtained by restricting the value of a mixing parameter gamma to 0 or 1. To enable estimation and hypothesis testing for gamma, an approximate supermodel is used in which the fitted values from the individual models appear in place of the original parametrization. In the case of nested linear models, the proposed test essentially reproduces the standard F test. The calculations required are for the most part straight-forward (basically, linear regression through the origin). The test is extended to cover situations in which serious bias in the maximum likelihood estimate of gamma occurs, simple approximate bounds for the bias being given. Two real datasets are used illustratively throughout.
Similar articles
-
Asymptotic confidence bands for generalized nonlinear regression models.Biometrics. 1995 Mar;51(1):142-50. Biometrics. 1995. PMID: 7766770
-
A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):21-31. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002. PMID: 12529567
-
Comparability of segmented line regression models.Biometrics. 2004 Dec;60(4):1005-14. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00256.x. Biometrics. 2004. PMID: 15606421
-
Variable selection for marginal longitudinal generalized linear models.Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):507-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00331.x. Biometrics. 2005. PMID: 16011698
-
Use and abuse of variance models in regression.Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1073-81. Biometrics. 1988. PMID: 3069138 Review.