Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jun;95(6):2790-8.
doi: 10.1172/JCI117983.

The effect of surgical bowel manipulation and anesthesia on intestinal glucose absorption in rats

Affiliations

The effect of surgical bowel manipulation and anesthesia on intestinal glucose absorption in rats

M R Uhing et al. J Clin Invest. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

The effects of surgical bowel manipulation and anesthesia on intestinal glucose absorption were determined in chronically catheterized rats. Total and passive rates of glucose absorption were measured using 3-O-methyl-glucose (3OMG) and L-glucose, metabolically inert analogues of D-glucose. The rates of 3OMG absorption immediately postoperative and 4 h later were 86 and 62% less than the absorption rate 6 d postoperative. The absorption rates of 3OMG 1 and 2 d postoperative were not different from 6 d postoperative. Absorption of L-glucose was not altered by bowel manipulation and anesthesia. Even after correction for the increased resistance of the unstirred water layer (UWL) after bowel manipulation, the rates of total and active intestinal glucose absorption immediately postoperative were only 11 and 15% of predicted rates of absorption. In chronically catheterized rats, > 75% of luminal 3OMG at a concentration of 400 mM was absorbed by active transport. The Km and Vmax of 3OMG active transport corrected for the resistance of the UWL were 11.3 mM and 15.6 mumoles/min, respectively. We conclude that measurements of intestinal glucose absorption performed within 24 h of surgical bowel manipulation greatly underestimate active absorption even if corrections are made to account for the increased resistance of the UWL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991 Aug;69(8):1143-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1991 Nov;261(5 Pt 2):R1313-20 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Nov;103(5):1460-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1992 Nov;263(5 Pt 1):G605-16 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1993 Oct;105(4):1117-25 - PubMed