Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jun;85(6):961-4.
doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00069-4.

Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy

Affiliations
Free article

Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy

J P Gearhart et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To define ultrasonographic criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy.

Methods: Forty-three prenatal ultrasound scans were studied from 25 pregnancies in which live delivery of an infant with classic bladder exstrophy occurred. The diagnosis of bladder exstrophy could be made retrospectively in 29 prenatal studies from 17 pregnancies. The time of the fetal ultrasound varied from 14-36 weeks' gestation (mean 23). The diagnosis of bladder exstrophy was made before delivery in only three cases.

Results: Five factors associated with bladder exstrophy were identified: 1) The bladder was not visualized on ultrasound in 12 of 17 cases (71%); 2) a lower abdominal bulge representing the exstrophied bladder was seen in eight of 17 cases (47%); 3) a small penis with anteriorly displaced scrotum was identified in eight of 14 males (57%); 4) the umbilical insertion was low set in five of 17 cases (29%); and 5) abnormal widening of the iliac crests was seen in three of 17 cases (18%).

Conclusion: The prenatal diagnosis of bladder exstrophy should be considered any time the bladder is not visualized or any of the aforementioned factors are noted.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources