Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Feb 15;483 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):251-64.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020582.

Responses of human masseter motor units to stretch

Affiliations

Responses of human masseter motor units to stretch

T S Miles et al. J Physiol. .

Abstract

1. The reflex responses to stretch were studied in single motor units and the surface electromyogram in human masseter. 2. Controlled stretches of the isometrically contracting jaw-closing muscles evoked short-latency (10-15 ms) and long-latency (35-70 ms) excitatory reflex responses in the masseter surface electromyogram. 3. The majority (65%) of tonically active masseter motor units were excited in both short- and long-latency phases of the reflex. The timing of the stimulus determined whether the unit discharged in the short- or long-latency phase. If a non-tonically active motor unit was recruited by the stimulus, it invariably discharged in the long-latency phase. 4. Although short-latency responses were strongly time-locked to the stimulus, there was very little shortening of interspike intervals (ISIs) in this phase of the reflex. The shortening of ISIs was more prominent and prolonged during the long-latency phase, which explains why this phase produces most of the reflex force changes following the stretch. 5. Within pairs of concurrently active motor units there was a tenfold range in the size of the short-latency response to the same stretch. 6. A substantial proportion (35%) of the twenty-two masseter motor units tested had no statistically significant short-latency reflex response. 7. In contrast to other human muscles, there was no functional connection between a population of Ia afferents and some masseter motoneurons. There are two possible explanations for this result. The short-latency, presumably monosynaptic, Ia afferent inputs may not be uniformly distributed to human masseter motoneurons. Alternatively, these inputs may be subject to tonic presynaptic inhibition that is not uniformly distributed throughout the masseter motoneuron pool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1992 Sep;455:641-62 - PubMed
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1986 Nov 11;71(2):181-6 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosci Methods. 1993 Mar;46(3):197-202 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(2):365-70 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1993 May;464:711-23 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources