How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease?
- PMID: 7781454
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02065545
How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease?
Abstract
Twenty-four normal subjects and 64 symptomatic patients with various degrees of reflux disease (24 with reflux symptoms without esophagitis and 21 with mild and 19 with severe esophagitis) underwent quantitative 24-hr intraesophageal pH monitoring. Various reflux parameters during supine, interprandial, and postprandial periods were examined by binary logistic regression and by CART analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity to separate the various groups of subjects and patients. The distinction was excellent between asymptomatic controls and patients with severe erosive esophagitis (sensitivity and specificity both 100% by logistic regression and 95% and 88%, respectively, by CART), but discrimination was poor when asymptomatic controls were compared to symptomatic patients without esophagitis (71% and 79% by logistic regression and 75% and 92% by CART), which is the most important indication for pH recording in clinical practice. A 3-hr postprandial pH recording was inadequate to distinguish the various groups. The acidity of the reflux episodes during the night appeared to be a crucial factor in the development of severe erosive esophagitis. The duration of esophageal acid exposure was another important factor in the development of reflux lesions.
Similar articles
-
Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Sep;33(9):1134-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01535790. Dig Dis Sci. 1988. PMID: 3409799
-
Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Feb;38(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01307537. Dig Dis Sci. 1993. PMID: 8425433 Clinical Trial.
-
Correlation of 24-hr esophageal pH patterns with clinical features and endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease.Dig Dis Sci. 1994 Jan;39(1):199-205. doi: 10.1007/BF02090083. Dig Dis Sci. 1994. PMID: 8281858
-
Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical?Hepatogastroenterology. 1992 Feb;39 Suppl 1:3-13. Hepatogastroenterology. 1992. PMID: 1577393 Review.
-
[Clinical significance of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in GERD patients].Nihon Rinsho. 2000 Sep;58(9):1818-22. Nihon Rinsho. 2000. PMID: 11004809 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.Gut. 1999 Apr;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1-16. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.2008.s1. Gut. 1999. PMID: 10741335 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications.Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Feb;47(2):241-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1013763616262. Dig Dis Sci. 2002. PMID: 11855537 Review.
-
Preservation of postural control of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in patients with reflux oesophagitis.Gut. 1999 Mar;44(3):313-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.3.313. Gut. 1999. PMID: 10026313 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.Gut. 1999 Aug;45(2):172-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.2.172. Gut. 1999. PMID: 10403727 Free PMC article.
-
Direct measurement of acid permeation into rat oesophagus.Gut. 2003 Jun;52(6):775-83. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.6.775. Gut. 2003. PMID: 12740330 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical