Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Mar;48(3):273-6.
doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)02306-j.

Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section

M Stark et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a procedure for cesarean section, consisting of a number of surgical techniques adopted from various sources and further developed.

Methods: The principal elements of the cesarean section procedure followed were: the Joel-Cohen method for opening the abdomen, suturing the uterus in one layer, and non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneal layers. The postoperative recovery of women who underwent this procedure (JCl--group) was compared with that of women who had undergone a Pfannenstiel incision, in which the uterus is sutured in two layers, and both peritoneal layers sutured (Pf2++ group).

Results: The incidence of postoperative febrile morbidity was 7.7% in the JCl--group compared with 19.8% in the Pf2++ group (P < 0.05). Adhesions were found in 6.3% of repeat operations after the JCl--operation compared with 28.8% after the Pf2++ operation (P < 0.05), and there was a non-significant trend toward fewer postoperative analgesics in the JCl--group.

Conclusion: The cesarean section procedure we have devised is not only safe, but has a lower risk of long- and short-term complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources