Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995:23 Suppl 1:S15-20.
doi: 10.1007/BF02464954.

Roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. versus amoxycillin 500 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg t.i.d. for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. versus amoxycillin 500 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg t.i.d. for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice

N C Karalus et al. Infection. 1995.

Abstract

Two hundred and forty-two patients over 16 years of age with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), matched for age and sex, were randomised to receive either roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. or amoxycillin 500 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg t.i.d. for 7 days, with a further 7 days if insufficient response was seen. Clinical efficacy at 7 days was 69% for roxithromycin and 56% for amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (p = 0.05) and at study end it was 91% for both antibiotics. There were fewer second treatment courses in the roxithromycin group (26% vs. 38%, p = 0.04) and a shorter treatment duration (8.29 days vs. 9.34 days, p > 0.05). Twelve patients (9.8%) treated with roxithromycin and 19 (17.1%) treated with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid had adverse effects possibly, or probably, related to the antibiotic. Roxithromycin appears to be a more appropriate choice than amoxycillin/clavulanic acid for the treatment of LRTI in the community given its more appropriate in vitro spectrum, efficacy against most common and atypical pathogens, greater cost-effectiveness, more convenient dosage regimen (b.i.d.), and superior tolerability profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Feb;28(2):141-52 - PubMed
    1. Prim Care. 1990 Dec;17(4):811-24 - PubMed
    1. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May-Jun;15(4 Suppl):91S-95S - PubMed
    1. J Fam Pract. 1987 Aug;25(2):137-41 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1988;8(2):107-10 - PubMed