Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature
- PMID: 7782435
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135992
Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of a hydrosalpinx influences in-vitro fertilization (IVF) prognosis. Comparisons were made between 69 IVF cycles in 37 patients carrying hydrosalpinges (hydrosalpinx group) and 67 IVF cycles in 41 patients without tubes or surgically sterilized (control group). Twenty-two patients carrying hydrosalpinges underwent salpingectomy or salpingoplasty (operated group); they then underwent 42 IVF trials which were compared with the two former groups. In the hydrosalpinx group, pregnancy rates by oocyte retrieval were 10.1% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies. In the control group, the corresponding pregnancy rates were 23.0 and 21.3% respectively. The implantation rate per embryo was 4.2% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies in the hydrosalpinx group and 11.0 and 10.4% respectively in the control group. The operated group had pregnancy rates of 38.1% for clinical pregnancies and 31.0% for ongoing pregnancies, with implantation rates of 17.4 (clinical) and 14.8% (ongoing) respectively. Pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically lower in the hydrosalpinx group as compared with controls and with the operated group. The differences between control and operated groups were not significant. In conclusion, the presence of a hydrosalpinx is thus associated with poor prognosis in IVF treatment. Surgical correction of such lesions appears to restore high success rates.
Similar articles
-
The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril. 1998 Mar;69(3):373-84. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00484-6. Fertil Steril. 1998. PMID: 9531862 Review.
-
Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles.Hum Reprod. 1998 Mar;13(3):736-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.736. Hum Reprod. 1998. PMID: 9572444
-
[Effect of salpingectomy on the results of IVF in women with tubal sterility--prospective study].Ceska Gynekol. 2001 Jul;66(4):259-64. Ceska Gynekol. 2001. PMID: 11569422 Czech.
-
Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates.Hum Reprod. 1994 May;9(5):861-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138606. Hum Reprod. 1994. PMID: 7929732 Clinical Trial.
-
The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction.Fertil Steril. 1998 Jan;69(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00447-0. Fertil Steril. 1998. PMID: 9457930 Review.
Cited by
-
Which patients with hydrosalpinx will benefit more from reproductive surgery to improve natural pregnancy outcomes?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e32806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032806. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 36827021 Free PMC article.
-
Uterus transplantation: From animal models through the first heart beating pregnancy to the first human live birth.Womens Health (Lond). 2016 Jul;12(4):442-9. doi: 10.1177/1745505716653849. Womens Health (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27638900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful implantation after reducing matrix metalloproteinase activity in the uterine cavity.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 May 11;11:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-37. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013. PMID: 23663265 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Sep;16(8):416-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1020565408018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999. PMID: 10478320 Free PMC article.
-
Mild ovarian stimulation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Dec;24(12):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-007-9179-9. Epub 2007 Dec 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007. PMID: 18058016 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical