GnRH agonist and iron versus placebo and iron in the anemic patient before surgery for leiomyomas: a randomized controlled trial. Leuprolide Acetate Study Group

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of leuprolide acetate depot plus iron compared with iron alone in the preoperative treatment of anemia due to prolonged or excessive bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas.

Methods: This was a phase III, stratified, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week multicenter study. Enrolled patients had hemoglobin levels of 10.2 g/dL or less and/or hematocrit values of 30% or less. Patients were entered into one of two strata based on their pre-study hematocrit level: stratum A, hematocrit less than or equal to 28%, and stratum B, hematocrit greater than 28%. Patients within each stratum were randomized to one of three treatment arms: leuprolide acetate depot 7.5 mg, leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg, or placebo. All patients received iron orally. Response was defined as a hemoglobin level of 12 g/dL or more and a hematocrit value of 36% or greater.

Results: Three hundred nine patients were entered into the study, of whom 265 were evaluated. Using our response criteria, a significantly greater number of patients in both leuprolide acetate groups (combined strata) responded to therapy than did those in the placebo group: 74% in each leuprolide acetate group versus 46% in the placebo group (P < .001). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-treated patients had a significant reduction in uterine and myoma volume when compared with the placebo group (P < .01). Hot flashes and vaginitis were reported significantly more often (P < .001) in the leuprolide acetate-treated groups than in the placebo group.

Conclusion: Both dosages of GnRH agonist plus iron were more effective than iron alone in treating the anemia of patients with uterine leiomyomas, in reducing uterine-myoma volume, and in alleviating bleeding and other leiomyoma-related symptoms.