Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Mar;21(3):257-60.
doi: 10.1007/BF01701484.

Reliability of clinical assessments of respiratory system compliance (Crs) made by junior doctors

B J Stenson  1 , R A Wilkie, I A Laing, W O Tarnow-Mordi
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Reliability of clinical assessments of respiratory system compliance (Crs) made by junior doctors

B J Stenson et al. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability of estimates of static respiratory system compliance (Crs) made by junior hospital doctors caring for ventilated newborn infants.

Design: A prospective comparison of junior doctors' estimates of Crs to the Crs measured immediately afterwards.

Setting: A regional neonatal intensive care nursery in Edinburgh, Scotland.

Patients: 46 ventilated newborn infants.

Measurements and results: Crs was estimated by three grades of junior doctor (Senior House Officer, Registrar and Research Fellow) using two different methods, (i) based on visual assessment of tidal volume in relation to inflation pressure (optical Crs) and (ii) directly using a visual analogue scale (analogue Crs). The Crs was then measured immediately afterwards using the single breath passive expiratory flow technique. The differences between the estimates and the measurements were calculated for each grade of observer and plotted against the corresponding measurements. The relationship between estimates and measurements was also expressed in terms of the coefficients of determination r2 calculated by least squares regression. With both methods of estimation observers tended to overestimate the Crs of infants with lower measured Crs and underestimate that of infants with higher measured Crs with many estimates differing from the measurements by more than 50%. Values of r2 ranged from 0.086 to 0.481 indicating a weak relationship between the estimates and the measurements.

Conclusions: Junior doctors' estimates of Crs were unreliable and did not represent a useful method of assessing respiratory function. The clinical use of compliance measurements merits wider evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 Jan;70(1):F16-8 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Feb;147(2):474-96 - PubMed
    1. S Afr Med J. 1976 Jan 31;50(5):128-30 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993 May;15(5):304-11 - PubMed
    1. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990 May 11;102(10):307-9 - PubMed

Publication types