Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis
- PMID: 7798975
- PMCID: PMC1073226
- DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.57.12.1466
Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis
Abstract
The results of a prospective study comparing ultrasound, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis are reported in patients with symptoms of recent carotid territory ischaemia. A total of 70 patients and 137 vessels were examined by all three techniques. The results obtained by each technique were reported blind. The mean difference (SD) for the comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography was -0.7 (14)%, for ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography 3.1 (15)%, and for magnetic resonance angiography and ultrasound -3.8 (15)%. The level of agreement was greater for the more tightly stenosed vessels. With the assumption that the results of the digital subtraction angiogram reflect the true situation, the sensitivity and specificity in the detection of > or = 30% stenoses were 93% and 82% with ultrasound and 89% and 82% with magnetic resonance angiography; for stenoses > or = 70% 93% and 92% with ultrasound and 90% and 95% with magnetic resonance angiography; and for stenoses of 70-99% 89% and 93% with ultrasound and 86% and 93% with magnetic resonance angiography. For occlusion the values were 93% and 99% with ultrasound and 80% and 99% with magnetic resonance angiography. Increased sensitivity and specificity were obtained when analysis was confined to those vessels in which ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography were in agreement over classification. It is thus possible to accurately categorize the degree of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery from a combination of ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography. The adoption of this combination for the investigation of patients before carotid endarterectomy removes the risk associated with conventional angiography and represents an important advance in the management of carotid stenosis.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.109330. J Vasc Surg. 2000. PMID: 10957649
-
Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1422-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01255.x. Br J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10583289
-
Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;35(4):405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 8. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18262445 Clinical Trial.
-
[Duplex ultrasonography in the study of carotid and vertebral artery stenosis (comparison with intra-arterial digitalized subtraction angiography)].Orv Hetil. 1993 Dec 5;134(49):2691-6. Orv Hetil. 1993. PMID: 8255579 Review. Hungarian.
-
False-negative magnetic resonance angiography with extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a report of two cases and review of the literature.Neurosurg Rev. 2005 Apr;28(2):154-8. doi: 10.1007/s10143-004-0354-5. Epub 2004 Oct 8. Neurosurg Rev. 2005. PMID: 15480890 Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1117-22. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003. PMID: 12812936 Free PMC article.
-
Semi-automated computer assessment of the degree of carotid artery stenosis compares favorably to visual evaluation.J Neurol Sci. 2008 Jun 15;269(1-2):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Jan 29. J Neurol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18234230 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2002 Jan;2(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s11910-002-0049-7. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2002. PMID: 11898579 Review.
-
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35815652 Free PMC article.
-
How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;71(2):155-60. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.155. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001. PMID: 11459885 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical