Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis
- PMID: 7799496
Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine the efficacy of screening mammography by age, number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, and duration of follow-up.
Design: Literature review and meta-analysis. DATA IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS: Literature search of English-language studies reported from January 1966 to October 31, 1993, using MEDLINE, manual literature review, and consultation with experts. A total of 13 studies were selected, and their results were combined using meta-analytic techniques based on the assumption of fixed effects.
Main results: The overall summary relative risk (RR) estimate for breast cancer mortality for women aged 50 to 74 years undergoing screening mammography compared with those who did not was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.83). The magnitude of the benefit in this age group was similar regardless of number of mammographic views per screen, screening interval, or duration of follow-up. In contrast, none of the summary RR estimates for women aged 40 to 49 years was significantly less than 1.0, irrespective of screening intervention or duration of follow-up. The overall summary RR estimate in women aged 40 to 49 years was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13); the summary RR estimate for those studies that used two-view mammography was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12) compared with 1.02 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.44) for those studies that used one-view mammography, and for those studies with 7 to 9 years of follow-up, the summary RR estimate was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.27) compared with 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.06) for those studies with 10 to 12 years of follow-up.
Conclusion: Screening mammography significantly reduces breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 to 74 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up, regardless of screening interval or number of mammographic views per screen. There is no reduction in breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 7 to 9 years of follow-up. Screening mammography may be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 49 years after 10 to 12 years of follow-up, but the same benefit could probably be achieved by beginning screening at menopause or 50 years of age.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1995 Sep-Oct;123(2):34-5
-
The efficacy of mammography and screening for breast cancer.JAMA. 1995 Aug 2;274(5):381; author reply 382-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.5.381b. JAMA. 1995. PMID: 7616628 No abstract available.
-
The efficacy of mammography and screening for breast cancer.JAMA. 1995 Aug 2;274(5):381-2; author reply 382-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530050028019. JAMA. 1995. PMID: 7616629 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):87-93. doi: 10.1258/096914107781261918. J Med Screen. 2007. PMID: 17626708
-
Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.Radiology. 2011 Sep;260(3):658-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110469. Epub 2011 Jun 28. Radiology. 2011. PMID: 21712474 Clinical Trial.
-
The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):2091-9. Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9392331 Clinical Trial.
-
Breast-cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years. Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.Int J Cancer. 1996 Dec 11;68(6):693-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19961211)68:6<693::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-Z. Int J Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8980168 Review.
-
Breast cancer screening in the older woman: an effective way to reduce mortality?Maturitas. 2010 Jul;66(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 6. Maturitas. 2010. PMID: 20451335 Review.
Cited by
-
Diabetes, Obesity, and Inflammation: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Features of Breast Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 9;22(5):2757. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052757. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33803201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
US women's attitudes to false-positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross-sectional survey.West J Med. 2000 Nov;173(5):307-12. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.307. West J Med. 2000. PMID: 11069862 Free PMC article.
-
Baylor Health Care System quality initiatives: a view from the HealthTexas Provider Network.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001 Oct;14(4):442-5; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2001.11927796. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001. PMID: 16369654 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Breast cancer screening: can we talk?J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):206-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10119.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11318918 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
MR imaging of hypertrophic olivary degeneration: is there a role for metaanalysis?AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jun-Jul;21(6):998-9. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000. PMID: 10871000 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical