[Multidimensional diagnosis in general medicine. Comparative study of the use of various instruments]

Abstract

This study was performed to test three instruments for functional status assessment in General Practice: the Dartmouth Coop Charts (COOP Charts), the Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) and the Duke University Health Profile (DUHP). All the instruments covered a score of functional aspects in physical, mental and social areas, providing a multidimensional measure of health status. We used these three instruments, validated by international studies, to acquire information concerning their feasibility and acceptability among patients from rural communities needing primary care and to test their validity in differentiating between patient subgroups. The COOP Charts, the FSQ and the DUHP were administered by physicians respectively to 98, 100 and 97 patients, waiting for a visit in the ambulatories of their General Practitioner. Answers relating to each instrument were analyzed according to sex, age and education of patients. All the instruments seemed to be feasible and acceptable, but only the COOP Charts and the FSQ were able to discriminate between different sex, age and scolarity groups. Taking into account the need to elaborate answers according to a formula when using the FSQ, we concluded that the best instrument for General Practice to provide a multidimensional measure of health status seems to be the COOP Charts.