Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Dec;171(6):1621-7.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90413-8.

Comparing clinician-applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing clinician-applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries

R H Allen et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to examine and compare clinician-applied loads during simulated vaginal delivery.

Study design: We developed a birthing model and a microcomputer data acquisition system and used them to measure clinician-applied extraction forces, moment, and rates for three perceived categories of delivery. In 39 experiments, clinicians simulated delivery of the fetal shoulders during vaginal delivery for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries.

Results: Clinicians averaged 84 N combined force and 473 N-cm neck-bending moment for routine deliveries, 122 N and 697 N-cm for difficult deliveries, and 163 N and 700 N-cm for shoulder dystocia deliveries (p < 0.002). No force or moment parameter was associated with clinician gender or experience. Force levels exceeding 100 N are reached for many clinicians (74% and 82%) for difficult and shoulder dystocia deliveries and for some clinicians (31%) for routine deliveries (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: We conclude that simulating shoulder dystocia in the laboratory may be useful in measuring extraction forces and neck-bending moment and that birthing models can be used to train clinicians in force, moment, and rate perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types