Comparing clinician-applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries
- PMID: 7802079
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90413-8
Comparing clinician-applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to examine and compare clinician-applied loads during simulated vaginal delivery.
Study design: We developed a birthing model and a microcomputer data acquisition system and used them to measure clinician-applied extraction forces, moment, and rates for three perceived categories of delivery. In 39 experiments, clinicians simulated delivery of the fetal shoulders during vaginal delivery for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries.
Results: Clinicians averaged 84 N combined force and 473 N-cm neck-bending moment for routine deliveries, 122 N and 697 N-cm for difficult deliveries, and 163 N and 700 N-cm for shoulder dystocia deliveries (p < 0.002). No force or moment parameter was associated with clinician gender or experience. Force levels exceeding 100 N are reached for many clinicians (74% and 82%) for difficult and shoulder dystocia deliveries and for some clinicians (31%) for routine deliveries (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: We conclude that simulating shoulder dystocia in the laboratory may be useful in measuring extraction forces and neck-bending moment and that birthing models can be used to train clinicians in force, moment, and rate perception.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for shoulder dystocia: an engineering study of clinician-applied forces.Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Mar;77(3):352-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1992397
-
Simulating birth to investigate clinician-applied loads on newborns.Med Eng Phys. 1995 Jul;17(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97318-j. Med Eng Phys. 1995. PMID: 7670698
-
Objective evaluation of the shoulder dystocia phenomenon: effect of maternal pelvic orientation on force reduction.Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;74(1):44-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1989. PMID: 2733940
-
[Shoulder dystocia: Guidelines for clinical practice--Short text].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.053. Epub 2015 Nov 2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26541561 Review. French.
-
Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047. Epub 2016 May 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27318182 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-assessment and Modulation of Traction During Shoulder Dystocia Simulation Training.J Patient Saf. 2024 Sep 1;20(6):388-391. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001240. Epub 2024 Aug 6. J Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 39101829 Free PMC article.
-
Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.Womens Health (Lond). 2016;12(2):251-61. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.103. Epub 2016 Feb 22. Womens Health (Lond). 2016. PMID: 26901875 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Shoulder Dystocia in Pregnancies Without Suspected Macrosomia Using Fetal Biometric Ratios.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 24;14(15):5240. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155240. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40806861 Free PMC article.
-
After shoulder dystocia: managing the subsequent pregnancy and delivery.Semin Perinatol. 2007 Jun;31(3):185-95. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.03.009. Semin Perinatol. 2007. PMID: 17531900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prescriptive and proscriptive lessons for managing shoulder dystocia: a technical and videographical tutorial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S1014-S1026. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.016. Epub 2023 Aug 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38462247 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical