Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Jun;19(2):101-10.
doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90120-1.

Comparative evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of Nocardia species

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of Nocardia species

J R Biehle et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

The E Test (PDM Epsilometer; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) was compared with microbroth dilution and disk diffusion for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Nocardia as a collaborative study by two geographically separate laboratories. A total of 52 clinical isolates and five species of Nocardia were used in this comparative evaluation. Susceptibility testing was performed with Mueller-Hinton media and eight antimicrobial agents. Growth of the test strains with Mueller-Hinton medium was generally satisfactory, with the majority of isolates producing adequate growth within 24-36 h. Growth inhibition ellipses were generally well delineated and uniform for most drugs, and the points of intersection with the E Test strip were generally easy to determine. An inoculum size of approximately 2.0 x 10(7) CFU/ml was optimal for performance of the E Test method with the Nocardiae. Comparison of E Test and microbroth dilution MICs revealed 89.4% agreement for all drugs within +/- 1 log2 dilution. Using NCCLS interpretive criteria for susceptible and resistant results, complete agreement between E Test and disk diffusion results was 93.3%, and between E Test and microbroth dilution results was 96.2%. Interpretive category errors occurred at rates of 18.2% (risk corrected), 0, and 4.1% for very major, major, and minor errors, respectively, when E Test results were compared with disk diffusion results, and 0, 0, and 3.8%, respectively, when E Test was compared with microbroth dilution. Inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility, within +/- 1 log2 dilution for all drugs, was 95% and 98%, respectively. Results from this study suggest that E Test may be suited for use as an alternative method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Nocardia species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources