Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Oct;97(10):511-7.

Use of the unilateral external fixator (monofixator) in fracture treatment: experience in 50 fractures

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7809637

Use of the unilateral external fixator (monofixator) in fracture treatment: experience in 50 fractures

M Hessmann et al. Unfallchirurg. 1994 Oct.

Abstract

From 1988 to 1992, a total of 50 fractures with associated soft tissue lesions were treated with a unilateral external fixator (monofixator). The location of the fracture was the tibia in 39 cases, the pelvis in 5 cases, the femur in 4 cases, and the ankle and the humerus in 1 patient each. There were 22 open fractures (56%). Unproblematic healing with the monofixator was achieved in 69.2% of tibial fractures after a mean healing time of 18.2 weeks. Axial dynamic compression was performed in 18 tibial fractures. Planned reosteosynthesis was performed in 8 tibial fractures (20%). No late problems were seen after secondary internal osteosynthesis. Complications with the monofixator in tibial fracture treatment were refracture in 3 patients, pin track infection in 3 patients and hypertrophic pseudarthrosis in 1 patient. The monofixator provides safe and stable fixation in lower limb fractures with severe associated soft tissue trauma. In unstable pelvic and femoral fractures, satisfactory reduction and stabilisation can be achieved, mostly lasting until definitive osteosynthesis is possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms