User charges for rural health services in Papua New Guinea

Abstract

This paper reports on a review of user charges for health services in rural areas of Papua New Guinea. Facilities implementing both fee for service and community risk sharing schemes were studied. This study found that there is a lack of any policy framework or practical guidelines on cost recovery. In some areas fees are being used as a fiscal tool rather than to further health policy. This study from Papua New Guinea raises serious questions about the virtue of cost recovery for health services in rural areas. Equity is an issue and the fees are creating a barrier both for entry and continuation in the health system; accountability is poor, and issues of cross subsidization are not addressed; fee revenues from rural health services are small and primarily of local significance; and are not being used to improve quality of health services. Cost recovery schemes in rural areas have the potential to provide a valuable contributory source of income to operate and improve health services. In practice, few are achieving this. It is concluded that health sector financing focus could be more fruitfully directed to financing mechanisms with greater potential to improve and expand health services.