Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994;23(4):337-44.

[Neuromonitoring in carotid surgery: possibilities and limits of transcranial Doppler ultrasound]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7817615

[Neuromonitoring in carotid surgery: possibilities and limits of transcranial Doppler ultrasound]

[Article in German]
M Dinkel et al. Vasa. 1994.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the suitability of transcranial Doppler sonography as an intraoperative monitor in carotid surgery, we compared measurements of mean blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery with the cortical response of somatosensory evoked potentials in a prospective study of 176 carotid operations. SEP recording was readily feasible during all procedures and by means of SEP loss all patients at risk for critical cross-clamp related cerebral ischemia were reliably identified. In contrast, TCD could not be used for assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in more than 40% of patients. What is more, in high risk patients with intraoperative loss of SEP, TCD could not be performed in 74% of cases. This high rate of failure limits the usefulness of TCD as an intraoperative monitor and detracts from the additional benefit of identifying cerebral embolism and hyperperfusion as potential causes of neurological deficits. In contrast to SEP recording, TCD cannot be recommended as a routine monitor in carotid surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms