Prospective randomized comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal-phase support in assisted reproduction
- PMID: 7819706
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02215991
Prospective randomized comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal-phase support in assisted reproduction
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of two forms of luteal-phase supplementation, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and progesterone (P), during gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRh-a)/controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles.
Design and patients: The study was a prospective, randomized evaluation of 77 patients. Group 1 patients (n = 38) received 2000 IU of hCG, injected subcutaneously, on days 3, 6, 9, and 12 after transvaginal aspiration of the oocytes (TVA = day 0). Group 2 patients (n = 39) received 50-mg daily injections of intramuscular (i.m.) P from days 2 to 14 after TVA. Blood tests were performed on days 0, 5, 8, and 12 after TVA.
Setting: The in vitro fertilization program of a tertiary care institution was the study setting.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were (1) pregnancy and implantation rates; (2) serum estradiol (E), P, and hCG levels; and (3) occurrence of side effects.
Results: Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group 1 versus group 2 were similar (36.7 vs 35.3 and 12 vs 14%, respectively). Regardless of pregnancy occurrence, on days 8 and 12 after TVA, serum E and P levels were higher in group 1 than group 2 but the resulting E/P ratios were similar. Five of 38 patients (group 1) developed moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) right after the first or second supplementary hCG injection. In these patients, the mean serum E level on the day of hCG trigger injection was about 3250 pg/ml and the number of follicles was between 9 and 17. In 6 of 39 patients (group 2) allergic reactions were observed at the P injection sites.
Conclusions: Based on our data, hCG administration as a form of luteal supplementation did not translate, in comparison to P, into significant benefits for the patients. At the same time, it significantly increased the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation. We suggest that whenever, during COH cycles, serum E levels are over 2500 pg/ml and the number of follicles exceeds 10, luteal support with hCG should be excluded.
Similar articles
-
HCG (1500IU) administration on day 3 after oocytes retrieval, following GnRH-agonist trigger for final follicular maturation, results in high sufficient mid luteal progesterone levels - a proof of concept.J Ovarian Res. 2014 Apr 3;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-7-35. J Ovarian Res. 2014. PMID: 24694069 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of low dose hCG for luteal support after triggering ovulation with a GnRH agonist in cases of polyfollicular development.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.013. Epub 2005 Dec 22. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. PMID: 16377065 Clinical Trial.
-
Towards an optimal luteal support modality in agonist triggered cycles: a randomized clinical trial.Hum Reprod. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):1079-1086. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey054. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29562260 Clinical Trial.
-
Luteal phase defects in assisted reproduction: the role of luteal phase supplementation.Acta Eur Fertil. 1992 Jan-Feb;23(1):15-9. Acta Eur Fertil. 1992. PMID: 1293894 Review.
-
The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30417-5. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. PMID: 25574681 Review. English, French.
Cited by
-
Is human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation beneficial for frozen and thawed embryo transfer in estrogen/progesterone replacement cycles?: A randomized clinical trial.Reprod Med Biol. 2017 Apr 4;16(2):166-169. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12023. eCollection 2017 Apr. Reprod Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 29259465 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(1):30-46. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009. PMID: 25478069 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 7;2015(7):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26148507 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of luteal support protocols in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles: a network meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64804-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38914570 Free PMC article.
-
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD002806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002806.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636707 Free PMC article.