[Treatment of puerperal endometritis. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of clindamycin + gentamycin vs. penicillin + chloramphenicol + gentamycin]

Abstract

This was a prospective, single-blind, comparative study in patients with diagnosis of puerperal endometritis, carried out at the Loayza Hospital in Lima, Peru. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clindamycin and gentamicin in the management of endometritis vs. penicillin, chloramphenicol and gentamicin for 10 days. Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 were evaluable for efficacy. Both treatment groups were comparable in the pre-treatment period in terms of age, history of pregnancies, controls by gynecologist, days of disease and fever, clinical symptoms like fever, pelvic pain, pulse, uterine size and in laboratory, in hematocrit and leukocytes count. In the culture of endometrium tissue, 27/32 patients (84.4%) in Group A (penicillin + CAF + gentamicin) and 27/30 patients (90%) in Group B (clindamycin + gentamicin) had positive cultures at baseline; 18 and 22 patients showed anaerobes; 8 and 4 patients showed anaerobes plus aerobes and, one patient in each treatment group showed aerobes only. Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides fragilis were the most frequently isolated pathogens. Improvement in lochia fetidity was more rapid in Group B, it turned transparent and not fetid since day 3. Complete cure was significantly better in Group B 24/30 (80%) in comparison with Group A 16/32 (50%) (p = 0.02). Partial response was found in 15 patients (43.3%) in Group A and 5 patients (16.6%) in Group B. Only one case was considered as bacteriological failure in Group A and only one patient in Group B was considered as failure and required an additional operation due to residual abscess.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)