Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976 Aug;58(2):276-81.
doi: 10.1172/JCI108469.

The local immune response to Escherichia coli O and K antigen in experimental pyelonephritis

The local immune response to Escherichia coli O and K antigen in experimental pyelonephritis

J W Smith et al. J Clin Invest. 1976 Aug.

Abstract

Although the systemic and local immune response to the O antigen of Escherichia coli has been well characterized, little information is available on the immune response to K anigen. Experimental hematogenous pyelonephritis was produced with Escherichia coli 06 K13 H1 and the serum and local (intrarenal) antibody response to O and K antigens was determined with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both local and serum antibody responses to the K antigen were significantly less than that to the O antigen. The K antigen induced low titer IgM and IgG antibody responses in fewer than one-half of the animals and did not induce a local IgA response in any animal. In contrast, the O antigen induced local antibody responses in each of the immunoglobulin classes in all animals from day 9 of infection. Similarly, the serum IgM and IgG antibody titers to the K antigen were significantly less than those evoked in response to the O component of the Escherichia coli. No serum IgA anti-K antibodies were detected. These observations helf clarify the roles of these two antigens in pyelonephritis. Although the K antigen of Escherichia coli functions as a virulence factor in upper urinary tract infections, this antigen does not elicit a significant immune response, whereas the O antigen does induce a significant antibody response which could be of protective or diagnostic benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Med. 1964 Jan 1;119:1-19 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1962 Sep 1;116:285-94 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 1972 Jul;109(1):129-35 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1974 May 30;290(22):1216-20 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1971 Mar 13;1(7698):514-6 - PubMed