Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):155-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.155.

Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths

Affiliations

Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths

P H Cartlidge et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the contribution that perinatal and infant necropsy makes to clinical practice and to see how this might be influenced by the quality of the investigation.

Design: Cohort analysis, with data from the all Wales perinatal survey, of perinatal and infant deaths during 1993 of babies born to mothers usually resident in Wales. The clinicopathological classification of death based on clinical details was compared with the classification after necropsy. Similarly, cases in which necropsy yielded new information were identified. The quality of the necropsy was assessed by scoring six aspects of the examination.

Subjects: 400 consecutive deaths at 20 weeks of gestation to 1 year of age.

Main outcome measures: Necropsy rate, effect of necropsy on clinicopathological classification, new information disclosed by necropsy, quality of necropsies, and the link between new information and quality of the necropsy.

Results: Necropsy was performed in 232 cases (58%). The clinicopathological classification was altered by necropsy in 29 cases (13%). New information was obtained in 60 cases (26%), and in 42 (18%) it disclosed the cause of death. The quality of necropsy was substantially higher when the main cause of death was detected than when nothing new was found.

Conclusion: Necropsy is underused. Clinicians should be more positive about necropsies and realise how much clinically relevant information can be obtained from a good quality examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Acta Med Scand. 1974 Sep;196(3):203-10 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1977 Jun 18;1(6076):1580-1 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jul;98(7):624-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1990 Feb 3;300(6720):295-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Oct;64(10 Spec No):1345-51 - PubMed