Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1994 Sep;102 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):45-50.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s345.

Role of DNA repair inhibition in lead- and cadmium-induced genotoxicity: a review

Affiliations
Review

Role of DNA repair inhibition in lead- and cadmium-induced genotoxicity: a review

A Hartwig. Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Sep.

Abstract

Compounds of lead and cadmium have been shown to be carcinogenic to humans and experimental animals. However, the underlying mechanisms are still not understood. In mammalian cells in culture, lead(II) is weakly mutagenic after long incubation times and generates DNA strand breaks only after treatment with high, toxic doses. Cadmium(II) induces DNA strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations, but its mutagenic potential is rather weak. However, both metals exert pronounced indirect genotoxic effects. Lead(II) is comutagenic towards UV and N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and enhances the number of UV-induced sister chromatid exchanges in V79 Chinese hamster cells. With regard to DNA repair, lead(II) causes an accumulation of DNA strand breaks after UV-irradiation in HeLa cells, indicating an interference with the polymerization or ligation step in excision repair. Cadmium(II) enhances the mutagenicity of UV light in V79 Chinese hamster cells and an increased sensitivity toward UV light is observed in various rodent and human cell lines. Furthermore, an inhibition of unscheduled DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation and a partial inhibition of the removal of UV-induced DNA lesions has been shown. For both metals, the indirect genotoxic effects are observed at low, nontoxic concentrations, suggesting that an interference with DNA repair processes may be predominant at biologically relevant concentrations. This might also explain the conflicting results of epidemiological studies obtained for both metals. Possible mechanisms of repair inhibition are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Occup Med. 1975 Feb;17(2):100-7 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1987 Dec 15;47(24 Pt 1):6606-13 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1976 Apr;37(4):1782-7 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Jun 7;70(3):812-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;271:273-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources