Dipstick urinalysis screening, asymptomatic microhematuria, and subsequent urological cancers in a population-based sample
- PMID: 7848421
Dipstick urinalysis screening, asymptomatic microhematuria, and subsequent urological cancers in a population-based sample
Erratum in
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994 Sep;3(6):523
Abstract
Screening urine for microhematuria as an indicator of serious disease is controversial because of the low positive predictive value of such screening and the costs and risks of the associated evaluation. To further evaluate test properties, we retrospectively examined the outcomes of 20,571 men aged > or = 35 years and women aged > or = 55 years who voluntarily had a Personal Health Appraisal in 1980 as members of a large prepaid health plan. Hematuria was detected by dipstick in 876 cases (4.3%); 278 were excluded because of evidence of previous urological disease which could cause hematuria. Review of the medical records of 598 patients with asymptomatic microhematuria as shown by a positive dipstick result indicated that 99% had a follow-up evaluation within 3 months of positive test results for hematuria and had various levels of urological evaluation thereafter. However, urological cancers (2 prostate, 1 bladder) developed in only 3 patients within the next 3 years. On the basis of San Francisco-Oakland Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data, rates of urological cancer were evaluated among patients whose test results were negative for hematuria, and these cancer rates were found to be almost the same as the rate among patients with asymptomatic microhematuria. Sensitivity of a single dipstick urinalysis result using microhematuria to indicate urological cancer within 3 years was 2.9%; specificity was 96.7%; and positive predictive value was 0.5%. Multivariate analysis which adjusted for age, gender, and race showed that the relative risk of 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-6.6) for urological cancer was not significantly elevated among patients with asymptomatic microhematuria compared with patients who had negative test results. These findings based on a single test are consistent with the current lack of recommendations for screening for microhematuria among asymptomatic adults.
Similar articles
-
[Time to stop testing adults for microhematuria].Lakartidningen. 2003 Nov 6;100(45):3598-9. Lakartidningen. 2003. PMID: 14650034 Review. Swedish.
-
Diagnosis of urologic malignancies in patients with asymptomatic dipstick hematuria: prospective study with 13 years' follow-up.Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.031. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18242356
-
Long-term outcome of patients with a negative work-up for asymptomatic microhematuria.Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.107. Epub 2009 Nov 13. Urology. 2010. PMID: 19913883
-
Dipstick pseudohematuria: unnecessary consultation and evaluation.J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):560-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.049. Epub 2009 Dec 16. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20018314
-
Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: summary of the AUA best practice policy recommendations.Am Fam Physician. 2001 Mar 15;63(6):1145-54. Am Fam Physician. 2001. PMID: 11277551 Review.
Cited by
-
Is race an independent prognostic factor for survival from prostate cancer?J Natl Med Assoc. 1998 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S713-9. J Natl Med Assoc. 1998. PMID: 9828588 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
The Investigation of Hematuria.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Nov 30;115(48):801-807. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0801. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018. PMID: 30642428 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence and associated factors for dipstick microscopic hematuria in men.BMC Urol. 2019 Aug 6;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0505-1. BMC Urol. 2019. PMID: 31387648 Free PMC article.
-
Glomerular Hematuria: Cause or Consequence of Renal Inflammation?Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 5;20(9):2205. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092205. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31060307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The prevalence of microscopic hematuria in a cohort of women with pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2450-6. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 24980137