Short-term Lupron or danazol therapy for pelvic endometriosis

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a 3-month trial of leuprolide acetate (LA; Lupron; TAP Pharmaceuticals, Deerfield, IL) versus danazol (Danocrine; Scenofi Winthrup Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) therapy on laparoscopically proven endometriosis.

Design: Endometriosis severity was assessed at the time of laparoscopy and patients were randomized to receive 0.1 mg SC LA (n = 22) or 800 mg danazol orally (n = 18) daily for 3 months. A second laparoscopy and/or laparotomy was performed to assess the change in the extent of endometriosis and for surgical therapy.

Setting: Private practice at a university-affiliated hospital.

Patients: Forty patients with mild, moderate, or severe endometriosis. Ten patients were excluded.

Intervention: Three-month treatment randomly assigned to either LA or danazol.

Main outcome measures: Prospective measurement of American Fertility Society endometriosis scores and size of ovarian endometriomata before and after therapy via laparoscopy.

Results: The mean endometriosis score including adhesions decreased significantly from 36 +/- 4.9 to 29 +/- 5.0 (mean +/- SEM) with LA and from 34 +/- 6.4 to 29 +/- 6.5 with danazol. The mean laparoscopic endometriosis score not including adhesions decreased from 27 +/- 3.5 to 22 +/- 3.4 with LA and 22 +/- 3.5 to 19 +/- 3.1 with danazol. Seven of 18 (39%) endometriomata responded to LA and 6 of 15 (40%) endometriomata responded to danazol.

Conclusion: We conclude that both danazol and LA will reduce endometriosis scores after a 3-month course of therapy. Larger clinical trials are needed to compare short courses of therapy with the more established 6-month trials. A 3-month versus a 6-month course of therapy offers obvious benefits including decreased cost and decreased side effects.