Similar articles

• Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia.

  Maki DG. Maki DG. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Apr;15(4 Pt 1):227-30. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 8207188 No abstract available.
• Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion.

  Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, Suleiman N, Hill LA, Bruso PA, Marts K, Mansfield PF, Bodey GP. Raad II, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Apr;15(4 Pt 1):231-8. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 8207189 Clinical Trial.
• Use of maximal sterile barrier precautions and/or antimicrobial-coated catheters to reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection.

  Lee DH, Jung KY, Choi YH. Lee DH, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29(10):947-50. doi: 10.1086/590356. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18754735
• A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies.

  Safdar N, Kluger DM, Maki DG. Safdar N, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2002 Nov;81(6):466-79. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200211000-00007. Medicine (Baltimore). 2002. PMID: 12441903 Review.
• [Catheter sepsis: pathogeny and prevention with a new connection model].

  Segura M, Oms L, Valverde J, Gil J, Sitges Serra A. Segura M, et al. Nutr Hosp. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):172-4. Nutr Hosp. 1990. PMID: 2127711 Review. Spanish.