Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Dec;12(6):567-72.
doi: 10.1080/02640419408732207.

Maximal isometric force and muscle cross-sectional area of the forearm in fencers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Maximal isometric force and muscle cross-sectional area of the forearm in fencers

V Margonato et al. J Sports Sci. 1994 Dec.

Abstract

The maximal isometric force (MIF) of a muscle is directly related to its cross-sectional area (CSA). Strength training produces an increase in muscular force while muscular hypertrophy becomes appreciable at a later time; in asymmetric sports, training causes significant increases in force and muscular mass of the dominant limb of the athlete. The aim of this study was to analyse the differences in muscular force and trophism between the dominant and non-dominant forearms in fencers and in controls. The data of 17 male distance runners (age 21.4 +/- 2.4 years, body mass 74.0 +/- 5.0 kg, height 180 +/- 6 cm) were compared with those of 58 male fencers (age 23.0 +/- 6.7 years, body mass 71.9 +/- 9.3 kg, height 178 +/- 7 cm) drawn from the ranking lists of the National Fencing Committee. They trained for a mean of 11.4 +/- 6.0 (range 2-36) years, commencing at 10.7 +/- 4.5 years of age. Cross-sectional area (muscle plus bone) was estimated in the dominant and non-dominant forearm using a simplified anthropometric method. Maximal isometric force was determined using a mechanical handgrip dynamometer. The differences in CSA and isometric force between the two limbs and between fencers and controls were tested using paired and unpaired Student's t-tests, respectively. Significant differences in CSA and maximal force were observed between the dominant and non-dominant forearm in fencers (both P < 0.001) and in controls (P < 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively). The fencers showed a greater CSA (P < 0.001) and force (P < 0.001) in the dominant forearm compared with the control group. Furthermore, the differences between the dominant and non-dominant limb of the fencers were significantly greater than the differences between the dominant and non-dominant limb of the controls (P < 0.001 for CSA and P < 0.05 for force). No significant differences in stress ratio (force/CSA) were obtained in either group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources