Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Jun;115(1-2):254-60.
doi: 10.1007/BF02244780.

Controlled comparison of nefazodone and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Controlled comparison of nefazodone and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients

M Ansseau et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Nefazodone, a phenylpiperazine antidepressant, exhibits novel dual activity on serotonin (5-HT) neurons; it binds to 5-HT2 receptors and inhibits 5-HT reuptake. Flexible doses of nefazodone (100-400 mg/day) and amitriptyline (50-200 mg/day) were compared in 106 major depressive inpatients in a 6-week double-blind study. Results showed significant superiority of amitriptyline over nefazodone on all rating instruments: Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (P < 0.0001), Hamilton depression scale (P < 0.0006), Clinical Global Impressions (P < 0.0001) and Patient Global Assessment (P < 0.01). A total of 65% of patients under amitriptyline and 56% of patients under nefazodone reported adverse events during the study, with significantly more dry mouth in the amitriptyline group (39% versus 11%, P = 0.001). Modal daily doses within the last treatment week reached 242 mg with nefazodone and 124 mg with amitriptyline. The lower efficacy of nefazodone, which contradicts comparative trials with imipramine in US patients, is discussed with regard to the dose of nefazodone, probably below the optimal therapeutic range for melancholic patients, and to the clinical differences between the patient samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1991 May;1(2):113-21 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1989;25(2):219-21 - PubMed
    1. J Affect Disord. 1990 Apr;18(4):289-99 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(1):147-50 - PubMed
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 1992 Jan 15;31(2):109-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources