Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes
- PMID: 787009
- PMCID: PMC274441
- DOI: 10.1128/jcm.4.3.227-231.1976
Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes
Abstract
Two commercially available micromethod multitest systems (API, Analytab Products, Inc., Minitek-Bioquest) were compared with conventional tests suggested by the Center for Disease Control for the identification of anaerobes. Anaerobiosis for the microsystems was achieved using GasPak system (BBL), A total of 175 anaerobes, including 158 clinical isolates and 17 reference strains, were used. Gram morphology, gas-liquid chromatography data, and biochemical reactions from the Center for Disease Control and Virginia Polytechnic Institute anaerobic manuals were used to identify the organisms. The Minitek system included a new anaerobe inoculum broth and two new disks, dextrose without nitrate and nitrate reductase disks. The percentage of correlation of 12 biochemicals using Minitek and 11 biochemicals using the API were compared with the Center for Disease Control reactions. The percentage of correlation of both positive and negative reactions with the API anaerobic strip ranged from 70.8 to 99.4% and with the Minitek from 97.1 to 100%. The microsystems were also evaluated as to the ease of use, adaptabilty to a clinical laboratory, time, and cost.
Similar articles
-
Identification of anaerobes on the Minitek System, compared to a conventional system.Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979;245(3):324-31. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979. PMID: 44787
-
Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):291-301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976. J Clin Microbiol. 1976. PMID: 773959 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures.J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):673-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.4.673-675.1982. J Clin Microbiol. 1982. PMID: 6759525 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983. J Clin Microbiol. 1983. PMID: 6355150 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative procedures for identification of anaerobic bacteria.Am J Med Technol. 1978 Jul;44(7):709-22. Am J Med Technol. 1978. PMID: 354382 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Dec;7(6):771-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01975045. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988. PMID: 3145860
-
Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):122-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.122-126.1985. J Clin Microbiol. 1985. PMID: 3881468 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of some anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific anaerobic infections in animals.Can J Comp Med. 1979 Apr;43(2):194-9. Can J Comp Med. 1979. PMID: 387184 Free PMC article.
-
Nose, throat, and fecal flora of beagle dogs housed in "locked" or "open" environments.Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Aug;34(2):207-21. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.2.207-221.1977. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977. PMID: 907342 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2509-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2509-2513.1989. J Clin Microbiol. 1989. PMID: 2681252 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources