Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Mar;107(3):662-8.
doi: 10.1378/chest.107.3.662.

Prospective assessment of cholesterol embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic vs conservative therapy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective assessment of cholesterol embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic vs conservative therapy

J C Blankenship et al. Chest. 1995 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether subclinical cholesterol embolization is a frequent sequela of thrombolytic therapy. Case reports of catastrophic cholesterol embolization temporally associated with thrombolytic therapy in 19 patients have suggested a causal relationship.

Patients and methods: We prospectively followed 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent coronary bypass surgery within 1 month. Twenty-nine received thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction; 31 were treated conservatively. Two muscle biopsy specimens and one skin biopsy specimen were obtained from the vein harvest site at the time of bypass surgery. Paraffin block and frozen sections from each biopsy specimen were analyzed for evidence of cholesterol embolization.

Results: Cholesterol emboli were found in biopsy specimens from 4 of 29 patients who had undergone thrombolytic therapy (14%) and in 3 of 31 patients who had not undergone thrombolytic therapy (10%, p = NS). Clinical evidence of cholesterol embolization occurred in one patient. Cholesterol emboli were distributed inhomogeneously; they were not observed in any skin biopsy specimen and were never present in more than one muscle biopsy specimen from each patient.

Conclusions: The prevalence of cholesterol embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy is not significantly higher than in those treated without thrombolytic therapy. The cholesterol embolization seen in 12% of our patients was mostly subclinical and was probably spontaneous and/or catheterization induced. Isolated case reports of severe cholesterol embolization temporally associated with thrombolytic therapy do not represent a phenomenon that has widespread subclinical occurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types