Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):450-3.

Focal intestinal perforation in the extremely-low-birth-weight infant

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7876936

Focal intestinal perforation in the extremely-low-birth-weight infant

C M Novack et al. J Perinatol. 1994 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

The purposes of this report were to (1) document the clinical and laboratory features of 11 extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants with focal intestinal perforation and (2) investigate the clinical events possibly associated with these perforations by examining matched pairs of infants with and without focal intestinal perforation. During the study period 173 infants with birth weights between 600 and 1000 gm were admitted to the neonatal intensive care nursery. Eleven of these ELBW infants had focal intestinal perforations and formed the study group. These infants were matched with 11 ELBW infants who did not have intestinal perforations or signs of inflammatory bowel disease. The matched pairs were similar in all respects except for a significantly higher percent increase in blood urea nitrogen level after treatment with indomethacin (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.02) in infants with intestinal perforation. At laparotomy the perforations were noted to be focal, often multiple, and on the antimesenteric border of the distal ileum. None of the infants showed clinical, radiographic, or intraoperative findings that were consistent with classifications for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The incidence of focal intestinal perforation in ELBW infants was 6% versus 2% for typical NEC. In addition, four of the 11 infants with intestinal perforation had positive cultures for either Staphylococcus epidermidis or Candida albicans, whereas none of the infants without perforation had positive cultures during the study period (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.09). We conclude that the clinical presentation and the characteristic intestinal lesions in this group of ELBW infants are distinct from those in typical cases of NEC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources