Does radical prostatectomy in the presence of positive pelvic lymph nodes enhance survival?
- PMID: 7881467
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00184109
Does radical prostatectomy in the presence of positive pelvic lymph nodes enhance survival?
Abstract
A retrospective review was performed on all patients with stage D1 prostate cancer treated at Duke University Medical Center between 1975 and 1989. A total of 156 patients underwent staging pelvic lymph-node dissection for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer (stage A or B) but were found to have disease metastatic to the pelvic lymph nodes (stage D1). Of this population, 42 patients also underwent radical prostatectomy (group 1), leaving 114 who did not have their prostate removed (group 2). The median cancer-specific survival was 11.2 years for group 1 versus 5.8 years for group 2 (P = 0.005). In patients with one or two positive lymph nodes the median cancer-specific survival was 10.2 years for group 1 versus 5.9 years for group 2 (P = 0.015). There was no difference in survival if three or more lymph nodes were positive. Adjuvant treatment with immediate androgen deprivation and/or postoperative radiation therapy failed to improve the survival experience. The incidence of local problems, including stricture formation, bleeding, or regrowth of cancer requiring dilation or surgical intervention (transurethral prostatectomy) averaged 9.5% in group 1 and 24.6% in group 2. These data show that patients with limited node-positive disease selected for radical prostatectomy experience a survival advantage over those denied such therapy and that this advantage is independent of adjunctive therapy.
Similar articles
-
Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure?J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):849-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049032.38743.c7. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12576797
-
[Evaluation of immediate androgen deprivation adjuvant therapy in patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy].Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 Jul;100(5):570-5. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.570. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2009. PMID: 19663244 Japanese.
-
Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results.J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2252-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143448.04161.cc. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15538242
-
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15028451 Review.
-
Role of radical prostatectomy in clinically non-organ-confined prostate cancer.Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Nov;15(11):455. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0455-9. Curr Urol Rep. 2014. PMID: 25234189 Review.
Cited by
-
[The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer].Urologe A. 2005 Jun;44(6):645-51. doi: 10.1007/s00120-005-0828-2. Urologe A. 2005. PMID: 15871005 Review. German.
-
Optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2007 Apr;25(2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0158-7. Epub 2007 Feb 27. World J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17333200 Review.
-
[Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].Urologe A. 2005 Nov;44(11):1295-302. doi: 10.1007/s00120-005-0927-0. Urologe A. 2005. PMID: 16228167 Review. German.
-
Long-term PSA-free survival and castration-free survival with delayed antiandrogen therapy in patients with one versus two or more positive nodes at prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2013 Apr;31(2):293-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0827-z. Epub 2012 Jan 24. World J Urol. 2013. PMID: 22270262
-
[Node-positive prostate cancer. Value of radical prostatectomy].Urologe A. 2010 Oct;49(10):1266-73. doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2399-0. Urologe A. 2010. PMID: 20844859 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical